Process monitoring
Site visits during the work: detector checks, lane discipline, search depth, marking, records and handling of finds.

Client-side checks that the contractor's survey and clearance meet the agreed standard, so that the area handed over is the area that was promised.
The most dangerous item is sometimes the one left in an area declared as checked. Quality control exists to find that gap before the site is handed over for construction.
We base our controls on the quality management principles of the International Mine Action Standards: quality assurance monitors the process while the work is under way, and quality control inspects the result. Our senior technical advisor has carried out such controls since 2005, using IMAS-based procedures at a time when Polish law did not yet set control rules. Since 2024 a Polish regulation has required a control check of at least 10% of cleared land.
Site visits during the work: detector checks, lane discipline, search depth, marking, records and handling of finds.
Independent re-search of randomly selected sample areas after clearance, against acceptance criteria agreed in advance.
Preparation of quality procedures that turn the legal minimum and the contract into clear rules for sampling, acceptance and non-conformities.
Function tests and test items confirming that detectors reach the specified depth for the expected threat.
Daily reports, target lists, find logs and handover records checked against the work actually done.
A clear recommendation to accept, re-work or reject an area, with the evidence that supports it.
Agree the standards, acceptance criteria, sampling rules and reporting with the client and the contractor.
Unannounced monitoring visits and checks of equipment, methods and records.
Sampling inspection of completed areas and comparison with the contractor's records.
A report with findings, non-conformities and an acceptance recommendation for each area.
Equipment used without test items or tests at the required depth.
Gaps between search lanes or missed edges around obstacles.
Target lists and maps that do not match the area actually searched.
Search speed raised to keep the programme, at the cost of quality.
Quality assurance checks that the process is right while the work is under way. Quality control inspects the finished result, typically by re-searching sample areas. A reliable programme uses both.
In Poland, yes. The Council of Ministers regulation of 26 September 2023 on clearance of land from explosive and dangerous materials (Journal of Laws 2023, item 2286) requires acceptance of cleared land after completion and a control check of at least 10% of the cleared area by qualified persons. The regulation sets a minimum, not a method, so the sampling approach, acceptance criteria and handling of non-conformities should be written into the contract before work begins. Requirements in other countries differ.
Yes. At sea the controls focus on survey data quality, target investigation records, positioning and the evidence behind each target closure.
Independent review of UXO risk assessments, specifications, RAMS and closure reports.
Learn more →UXO risk support for wind farm foundations, cables and landfalls in the Baltic and North Sea.
Learn more →The whole UXO risk management process for offshore, nearshore and onshore projects.
Learn more →30+ years in EOD: UN and NATO missions, marine, port and land clearance.
Learn more →Tell us about the site, the scope of clearance and the contract stage. We will propose a control plan proportionate to the risk.