UXO risk assessment
Comprehensive ordnance threat evaluation for marine and land environments

We verify whether project controls, procedures and documentation reflect the real conditions of execution.
DISCUSS PROJECT RISKOffshore • Nearshore • Onshore

Comprehensive ordnance threat evaluation for marine and land environments
Systematic identification of execution-phase hazards and mitigations
Post-mitigation risk evaluation against acceptance thresholds

Technical work methodology review and compliance verification
Authorization chain integrity from planning to execution
Risk Assessment and Method Statement adequacy review

Field data verification against stated methodologies
Contractual compliance evidence and deliverable validation
Documentation chain from mobilization through demobilization

Evidence-based project continuation or suspension advisory
Non-conformance resolution pathways and timelines
Re-baseline strategies when documentation diverges from execution
Independent review of UXO risk assessments, survey and clearance methodology, ALARP documentation and contractor deliverables, based on CIRIA C681, CIRIA C754 and IMAS.
The offshore investor does not need another pair of hands on deck. They need someone who can answer the only question that matters:
"Can I safely continue this project - and who bears responsibility if something goes wrong?"
We find the exact point where documentation stops matching execution reality. That delta - between what the paperwork says and what the site shows - is where unpriced risk accumulates. Our role is to surface it before it becomes a liability.

Company registered within the NATO Codification System
Auditing and management-system experience
Completed training and applied reference frameworks
Company identification code
Senior technical advisor's operational experience
ISO and UNMAS refer to experience, completed training and applied reference frameworks. The 30+ years figure describes the senior technical advisor’s operational experience, not the age of the company.
An assignment can cover a single document, a disputed anomaly, a specific design change or a whole project stage. Before we start, we agree the question to be answered, the input data, the limits of the assessment, the form of the result, the deadline and the fee.
Review of historical data, the scope of the planned intervention, survey requirements and criteria for dealing with anomalies.
Assessment of specifications, methods, procedures, reports, certificates and ALARP analyses, taking into account the limits of the methods used.
Checking the continuity of evidence from input data to conclusion, deviations from requirements and responsibilities at the interfaces between contractors.
Technical support during survey, target investigation and EOD works; review of survey data and investigation records within an agreed scope.
Assessment of the effects of a design change or a find, and a clear distinction between the area surveyed, checked and cleared.
For project reviews, cooperation or independent technical support, please contact us directly.
WRITE TO USDOWNLOAD THE PROPOSAL (PDF)